- ENABLE MICROSOFT SILVERLIGHT ON MAC SOFTWARE
- ENABLE MICROSOFT SILVERLIGHT ON MAC CODE
- ENABLE MICROSOFT SILVERLIGHT ON MAC LICENSE
- ENABLE MICROSOFT SILVERLIGHT ON MAC ISO
- ENABLE MICROSOFT SILVERLIGHT ON MAC FREE
ENABLE MICROSOFT SILVERLIGHT ON MAC FREE
You just did free market research for Microsoft.
ENABLE MICROSOFT SILVERLIGHT ON MAC CODE
Net environment any time soon, and if you come up with a good project then Microsoft will merely come up with something closed and integrated with the next version of Visual Studio and leave your code to stagnate. The MS-PL code you see dotted around is not coming out of a. Within a Microsoft controlled environment, possibly. Rotor was a classic example in that regard. I hope Microsoft aren’t expecting to see any outside code contributions, or even people doing anything with it. Anyone who says anything different is either uninformed or lying to you. The MS-PL projects only exist to make life easier for people like me, and the MS-RL projects are a bone for schools to teach using microsoft technologies. net developer point of view, a library licensed under the MS-PL is just as useful and relevant to me as something licensed under the GPL. MS doesn’t care about making their competitors lives easier, but they care alot about their developers.
The DLR/IronRuby/IronPython are obvious exceptions, but I agree in a general way.
I would not be suprised if the work they did with ROTOR helped them push out a mac version of of the CLR for silverlight. Things like singularity are created to test out ideas, those ideas are then rolled into products. Barely anything ever gets productized directly out of MS Research. MS-PL has a hell of alot of use if you are a.
ENABLE MICROSOFT SILVERLIGHT ON MAC LICENSE
Singularity as it stands is only useful in an academic setting, the license makes it inappropriate for use in any practical way. Net, and the academic license is where the latter is possibly feasible or where they see it as a real risk. The MS-PL is generally used for code you will have great difficulty getting off Microsoft platforms like Windows and.
ENABLE MICROSOFT SILVERLIGHT ON MAC SOFTWARE
Inevitably, Microsoft will see you as competition, as a lot of software vendors have found out. What was that about black helicopters again, because I believe that’s pretty much the point? Regardless of whether Microsoft use an open source license or not, don’t expect to be able to do much with the code. They don’t mind sharing their toys, but at the same time don’t want other companies to benefit from their beefy R&D budget. How did that work out, considering that Rotor was just a very cut down CLR that no one did anything with? …which was intended to explore ideas that may give their own products a competitive advantage in the future. MS-RL are for things specifically getting released for academic purposes.ĭo you think Singularity is merely going to be an academic exercise for Microsoft? ? When something is just a bit too close to reality, mention ‘black helicopters’ -). The whole “black helicopters” reasoning you are giving is wrong too. So we’ve established that Singularity is not available under an open source license, and not available under terms that we would all recognise as open source? We’re not interested in the MS-PL here because it has no relevance whatsoever.Īcademics are best off using code they can do something with and make something out of, and the current crop of MS-PL projects are somewhat less than stellar so I fail to see what relevance either license has. The MS-PL has no restrictions on it, and is OSI certified as open source (which is the only real, legal way to say something is open source) The MS-RL is not their open source license, the MS-PL is.
ENABLE MICROSOFT SILVERLIGHT ON MAC ISO
iso image for use in a virtual machine or a real-world install, or a.